The House of Representatives has
raised questions over the extent of the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN)
authority to impose fees, charges, penalties and other financial obligations
through regulations, guidelines, circulars and other subsidiary legislative
instruments.
The issue has emerged as a
central focus of a fresh investigation by the House Committee on Delegated
Legislation into the exercise of regulatory powers by the apex bank and the
financial implications of its subsidiary legislation.
The committee’s investigation
followed a motion sponsored by Hon. Baraje Yusuf Kure, representing
Bosso/Paikoro Federal Constituency of Niger State, who acknowledged the CBN’s
statutory powers to issue regulations, rules, guidelines and circulars but argued
that those powers must remain within the limits established by the Constitution
and relevant Acts of the National Assembly.
At the heart of the inquiry is
whether financial obligations created or imposed through CBN subsidiary
legislation have a clear statutory foundation.
The lawmakers want to determine
whether fees, charges, penalties, expenditures and other monetary consequences
arising from CBN regulations were properly authorised by the enabling laws
under which the apex bank exercises its powers.
The committee is also expected to
examine the legal and statutory basis of the regulations, guidelines,
circulars, directives and other instruments issued by the CBN and determine
whether they were made and implemented within the powers conferred on the bank.
The question is particularly
relevant to banks and other financial institutions because CBN regulatory
instruments can impose compliance requirements and sanctions where regulated
entities breach prescribed rules.
For example, the CBN’s 2025
guidelines for agent banking provide for sanctions and administrative penalties
where participants breach specified provisions. The guidelines also give the
CBN powers to impose remedial measures, including suspension or prohibition
from certain activities in specified circumstances.
The existence of such sanctions
in a CBN guideline does not, by itself, establish that they are unlawful. The
issue before the lawmakers is whether particular regulatory measures have the
necessary authority under the relevant enabling legislation.
The investigation could have
wider implications for the financial services industry if the committee
identifies areas where the legal basis for particular charges or penalties
requires clarification.
For regulated institutions, the
statutory foundation of regulatory charges and sanctions is important because
such obligations can affect compliance costs, operating expenses and the
financial consequences of breaches.
The committee is therefore
expected to examine the chain linking the enabling Act, the CBN regulation or
guideline issued under that Act and any resulting financial obligation.
Lawmakers also want to establish
whether financial obligations have been properly authorised, collected,
recorded or incurred in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
The examination of regulatory
charges is taking place alongside a separate review of the CBN’s financial
reporting for 2024 and 2025.
Committee Chairman, Hon. Richard
Olufemi Bamisile, directed the CBN to submit its summary consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2025,
together with relevant Financial Reporting Council documents and approvals
relating to the bank’s audited consolidated and separate financial statements.
KPMG and Ernst & Young have
also been asked to provide relevant audit documents, while Jim Obazee is
expected to submit evidence and documents relating to concerns he previously
raised about the CBN’s financial statements.
The committee has set October 6,
2026 as the deadline for the submission of the requested documents.
CBN Governor Olayemi Cardoso and
relevant officials of the apex bank are expected to appear before the committee
and provide regulations, guidelines, circulars, approvals, financial records
and implementation reports.
Other stakeholders expected to
participate include the Financial Reporting Council, KPMG, Ernst & Young,
economist Bismarck Rewane, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria
and the Association of National Accountants of Nigeria.
The committee said matters
falling outside its mandate would be referred to the appropriate House
committee or competent authority.
The investigation has not
established that the CBN unlawfully imposed any particular charge or penalty.
Rather, lawmakers are seeking the
underlying legislation, regulations, financial records and other evidence to
determine whether the apex bank has operated within the authority delegated to
it by the National Assembly.
The outcome could provide greater
clarity on the boundary between the CBN’s regulatory powers and the legislative
powers reserved for the National Assembly, particularly where regulatory
decisions create financial obligations for banks, financial institutions and
other market participants.
The committee is expected to
consider the evidence submitted by the CBN and other stakeholders before
adopting its findings and recommendations and, where necessary, seeking further
directives from the House.
Post a Comment